Search
× Search
Monday, December 23, 2024

Archived Discussions

Recent member discussions

The Algorithmic Traders' Association prides itself on providing a forum for the publication and dissemination of its members' white papers, research, reflections, works in progress, and other contributions. Please Note that archive searches and some of our members' publications are reserved for members only, so please log in or sign up to gain the most from our members' contributions.

Sometimes Less is More – The Overtrading Trap - Most traders think they need to trade a lot to make a lot of money. I once counseled a fellow who wanted to be a “scalper”. He thought he had to

photo

 Adam Halpern, President of Online Trading Software Company

 Wednesday, December 23, 2015

trade 100 times a day. Imagine his disappointment when I told him he’d never be a successful trader trading that often. It wasn’t a surprise when he never came back. I knew another trader who, in an effort to take more trades and (hopefully) make more money, traded a 30 second chart. He was so jacked ...


Print

2 comments on article "Sometimes Less is More – The Overtrading Trap - Most traders think they need to trade a lot to make a lot of money. I once counseled a fellow who wanted to be a “scalper”. He thought he had to"

photo

 Mark Brown mark@markbrown.com, Global Quantitative Financial Research, International Institutional Trading, Algorithmic Modeling.

 Friday, December 25, 2015



I firmly believe anything you can do to eliminate the number of trades that you initiate will result in higher profitability. Over trading kills many accounts.


photo

 Guy R. Fleury, Independent Computer Software Professional

 Monday, December 28, 2015



@Mark, overtrading with a negative edge might kill an account. But trading with an edge, you definitely want to trade more.

I don't adhere to the 50/50 proposition. Anyone can most certainly play that way, but the stock market is not 50/50. Why not follow its lead?

Going back to the mathematics of it, I can write: Ʃ(n)profits = [Ʃ(n)q(i)]*p(d) – Ʃ(n)[q(i)p(i)]. It resumes all stock trading activity in a single stock, and for a single trade you get: profit(loss) = q*(p(out) – p(in)), or more concisely: profit(loss) = q*Δp. The above expression says: the total sum of generated profits from n trades is equal to current price or sold price minus their respective costs. And if you can generate an average positive Δp (an edge) then you would want n as large as possible, even going as far as HFT.

So, I do not agree with the article's conclusion.

Please login or register to post comments.

TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS
Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2018 Algorithmic Traders Association