Я очень люблю смотреть на море. Оно очень разное бывает тихое и спокойное , как во флэте. А иногда волны достигают громадной величины, но есть признаки когда будет шторм. изучив эти признаки можно оказаться на гребне большой волны, наслаждаясь огромной энергией. И важно понять когда эта энергия теряет свою силу.

I agree with you! You have summarized the essentials.

Thomas - the recent discussion titled T/A Fails Time and Time Again - Why? Actually explores how T/A might actually work more dependably with consistent results when using non time constrained data. Not that T/A doesn't work.

Where are the examples of T/A & the 139 stocks

I think we are looking at the use of TA in absolute terms, instead of relative terms. TA indicates possible outcomes, or approximate outcomes based upon previous price action. This is fine, it does do that. What it does not do is to give solid and definite solutions with solid entries and exits, these solutions have to be worked up by the trader. The reliability of the results obtained may be improved by using specific techniques like non time constrained data, or rigid adherence to a set of rules developed by the trader. This is entirely correct. However in the final analysis TA, as helpful and useful as it may be in expert hands, will not provide absolute solutions to the market. Even in the best and most expert hands, there is always the possibility of a bad trade due to a bad interpretation of a TA pattern or setup. Absolutely no one scores 100% profitable trades at all times regardless of what technique they use.

Paul - I think it would be logical to follow the top five to ten or so of the largest cap stocks in option-able indexes. This will bring you to a portfolio that has all the action covered.

Oscar - there are a couple of trading methods where a trader can win absolutely 100% of the time. You have to have an open mind that anything is possible, because it is.

Мое мнение, никто и никогда не сделает 100% сделок в плюс. да это и не нужно для прибыльной торговли

Whatever type of analysis is based on information that has been given/announced to the market. The reactions to that information cause what's happening or not. What if the information is manipulated to certain extent? There's no guarantees whatsoever.

It's a probability game, casino make money with only 51%. TA is like 80% accurate. From me, most of the time, the trouble is in the MM as M.Kee said, not TA.

Самая большая беда это СТРАХ.

Mark, with no intention to offend you, I find it very hard to believe that there are trading methods that produce 100% wins. Perhaps if you were kind enough to provide some kind of general information as to what these methods may be, it might be possible to open my eyes to new possibilities.

Oscar - I know it is hard to believe you can win 100% of the time and never take a loss. However there are several trading methods that are capable of that. One such method involves selling naked options, given a solid plan and adequate reserve capital you can not lose. There are of-course other less known methods which do not involve options as well.

OK Mark, I had not thought of this and you may be right. I will have to think about it.

I agree on that. I'm sure that it works

Thomas: do you use TA also as a way to classify that sentiment table, or only for trading what the table shows?

Sentiment Table is algorithmicly derived, but generally yes.

I think Matthieu got it correct here. Trading/Investing is a game of probability. As long as you aren't too greedy, make reasonable assumptions, and act accordingly, getting things >50% correct is certainly achievable. Keep in mind that Warren Buffet had one of his worst years on record (purely performancewise relative to the market), but was still able to make a number of acquisitions and substantially profitable investments.