Search
× Search
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Archived Discussions

Recent member discussions

The Algorithmic Traders' Association prides itself on providing a forum for the publication and dissemination of its members' white papers, research, reflections, works in progress, and other contributions. Please Note that archive searches and some of our members' publications are reserved for members only, so please log in or sign up to gain the most from our members' contributions.

SEC Reg D vs Reg A+ The New Rules for Fundraising

photo

 Kat Cook, Financial Services Executive

 Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Exciting news from the SEC: the ‘IPO-Lite’ is coming!


Print

1 comments on article "SEC Reg D vs Reg A+ The New Rules for Fundraising"

photo

 Alex Krishtop, trader, researcher, consultant in forex and futures

 Thursday, April 2, 2015



This classification, although in quite a simplified form, indeed covers most of possible viable trading strategies. However it has two noticeable flaws:

1. It lacks one important class: trading sentiment of certain groups of market participants.

1. Specialised knowledge of an instrument is overly simplified to only insider trading, stock picking or market making, while analysis of non-market professional information always delivers decent results, especially in commodities.

Also I would refrain from obsequious statements like "if it's good enough for PTJ it works for me" — one needs to have quite some infrastructure and/or capital to play games of arbitrage nowadays.

Please login or register to post comments.

TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS
Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2018 Algorithmic Traders Association