Search
× Search
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Archived Discussions

Recent member discussions

The Algorithmic Traders' Association prides itself on providing a forum for the publication and dissemination of its members' white papers, research, reflections, works in progress, and other contributions. Please Note that archive searches and some of our members' publications are reserved for members only, so please log in or sign up to gain the most from our members' contributions.

Spoofing Is Good

photo

 David B. Weiss, Senior Analyst at Aite Group

 Monday, February 2, 2015

Spoofing—for lack of a better word—is good.Spoofing is right.Spoofing works.Spoofing clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.Spoofing, in all of its forms… has marked the upward surge of mankind.And...


Print

5 comments on article "Spoofing Is Good"

photo

 Larry Kase, Financial Analyst and Hedge Fund Principal

 Wednesday, February 4, 2015



Spoofing is illegal with good reason. The regulators regard it as fraud. Perhaps condoning the practice reflects the fact that the landscape is heavily populated by people who lost their moral and ethical compass. The capital markets are a rough and tumble environment, a shark tank. However, no purpose is served by glossing over the shady aspects of the business and pretend that shady practices are actually good.


photo

 Neil Crammond, l

 Thursday, February 5, 2015



spoofing whether good or bad does go on; thats my point as regulators exchanges deny it . Any surveillnce dept watching a ladder can monitor flipping or spoofing ; in fact alot of training schools teach how to trade against them .

This pratice only proves how false the liquidity is .


photo

 Gregory Strzelichowski, Trader

 Sunday, February 8, 2015



I'm not sure i follow; what do we mean by "spoofing"? Lets say it means to place a buy limit order at the best available bid in the ladder for 1,000 S&P500 futures contracts for a total of 200mili-seconds and then immediately cancel said order. Most retail traders won't see that "flicker". Most institutional screen traders won't see that flicker. The only folks that will "see" that order are quant based, low latency, and often high frequency traders. If they then act on that information, where is the harm? The "spoofer" took risk, because he could have definitely been hit on his bid, resulting in an adverse price change; the algos that send actual orders are doing so with real money and real volume is changing hands; market makers continue to provide liquidity and update their prices, life goes on. Where is the harm? Specifically, if no trade occurred without the spoffing and price just moved up and down without any volume, that is still volatility. With people hitting the bid/ask based on their beliefs induced by spoofers we still have volatility but with more volume. Where is the harm? thank you.


photo

 Tue Jensen, Risk Management Trader at Peninsula Petroleum

 Sunday, February 8, 2015



D


photo

 Larry Kase, Financial Analyst and Hedge Fund Principal

 Sunday, February 8, 2015



Spoofing is an effort to hoodwink other systems through the subterfuge of false activity. Spoofing essentially involves virtually simultaneous order entry and cancellation. The bid or offer is a charade. Slip ups can happen so getting hit here or there is the cost of doing business. The rarity minimizes the expense or damage. Spoofing is illegal. Entering fake orders regardless of the circumstances is a blatant violation of long standing regulations. The intent of such shenanigans is nothing less than market manipulation. Spoofing is another aspect of the high speed cat and mouse game. There is no good outcome and is harmful by definition.

Please login or register to post comments.

TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS
Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2018 Algorithmic Traders Association